One time in his ministry Osho commented on the UN Declaration of Human Rights. A few days later, as SN remembers, he enumerated his own list of improved suggestions for Human Rights. This second Human Right might prove, in today’s world, even more controversial than in the seventies and eighties.
Osho’s Second Human Right
Love should be accepted as one of the most fundamental human rights, and all societies have destroyed it. They have destroyed it by creating marriage. Marriage is a false substitute for love.
In the past, small children were married. They had no idea what love is, what marriage is. And why were small children married? For a simple reason: before they become young adults, before love arises in their hearts, the doors have to be closed. Because once love takes possession of their hearts then it will become very difficult….
No child marriage is human. A man or a woman should be allowed to choose their partners and to change their partners whenever they feel. The government has no business in it, the society has nothing to do with it. It is two individuals’ personal affair. The privacy of it is sacred.
If two people want to live together, they don’t need any permission from any priest or any government. They need the permission of their hearts. And the day they feel that the time has come to part, again they don’t need anybody’s permission. They can part as friends, with beautiful memories of their loving days.
Love should be the only way for men and women to live together. No other ritual is needed.
The only problem in the past was what would happen to the children; that was the argument for marriage. There are other alternatives, far better. Children should be accepted not as their parents’ property — they belong to the whole humanity. From the very beginning it should be made clear to them, “The whole humanity is going to protect you, is your shelter. We may be together — we will look after you. We may not be together; still we look after you. You are our blood, our bones, our souls.”
In fact, this possession by the parents of the children is one of the most dangerous things that humanity goes on carrying. This is the root of the idea of possessiveness. You should not possess your children. You can love them, you can bless them, but you cannot possess. They belong to the whole humanity. They come from beyond; you have been just a passage. Don’t think more than that about yourself. Whatever you can do, do.
Every commune, every village should take care of the children. Once the commune starts taking care of the children, marriage becomes absolutely obsolete. And marriage is destroying your basic right to love.
If man’s love is free, there will not be blacks and whites, and there will not be these ugly discriminations, because love knows no boundaries.
You can fall in love with a black man, you can fall in love with a white man. Love knows no religious scriptures. It knows only the heartbeat, and it knows it with absolute certainty. Once love is free, it will prepare the ground for other fundamental rights.
In fact, if you ask the scientists, people falling in love should be as different as possible. Then they will give birth to better children, more intelligent, stronger. We know it now; we are trying it all over the world as far as animals are concerned. Crossbreeding has given us better cows, better horses, better dogs. But man is strange. You know the secret, but you are not bettering yourself.
All the royal families are suffering. They create the greatest number of idiots, because they go on marrying amongst themselves. Royal blood cannot mix with a commoner’s blood — even in the twentieth century we think in terms of royal blood. Blood is simply blood. But if just a dozen families go on marrying amongst themselves continually, they create many kinds of diseases.
I have never come across any person belonging to a royal family who has intelligence, and in India I have been acquainted with almost all the royal families. It is not only that their minds remain retarded, their bodies lose many things.
You must have heard the name of Rasputin.
Before the Russian revolution he had become the most important man in Russia, for the simple reason that the child of the Czar had a disease — if he wounded himself accidentally then the bleeding could not be prevented. No medicine could prevent it, there was no way; the blood would go on flowing out. And that is one of the symptoms of marrying close relatives.
Rasputin was a great hypnotist. He was not a saint and he was not a sinner, he was simply a great hypnotist. He managed with hypnosis to prevent the blood from flowing out of the child. What no physician was able to do…and the child was going to be the successor to the greatest empire of those days. Rasputin certainly became very important. Without him the child’s life was in danger.
But still those royal families, although they have lost their kingdoms, their empires, continue to marry amongst themselves. It creates a very weak personality.
There should be no boundaries — that a Hindu should marry only a Hindu, or a Brahmin should only marry a Brahmin. In fact, the rule should be that the Indian should never marry an Indian. The whole world is there; find your spouse far away, beyond the seven seas, and then you will have children who are more beautiful, more healthy, long living, far more intelligent, geniuses. Man has to learn crossbreeding, but that is possible only if marriage disappears and love is given absolute respect. Right now it is condemned.
Osho
Who is going to implement Osho´s version of human rights? Is this the pious responsibility for Cameron, Modi, Markel, Obama? Unfortunately. even the book is not available, once it was a prime publication.It seems Jayesh and Bros. believe in their hearts their master was a big mouth too often.
P.S: As the life was, I was present in this series when Osho spoke about his basic rights. The book was out within a fortnight.
When Osho spoke before full Buddha Hall gathering, He was debating in the college competition but uttering His words as master, as voice of the Existence. This nerves me utterly, how coward;y disciples have become. They simply ditch everything which is not concerned with their own futuristic enlightenment.
Such people think Enlightenment is a journey booked through Thomas Cook!
Here is the image of the cover title.
SP, your memory may be a little woolly. AS SN collective remembers, Osho’s reflections in this area were in a series of lectures called ‘Sermons in Stones’, Nov/Dec 1986, published in 1987. We just checked, many copies of that book are available on Amazon UK, so it is not true to say it has “disappeared”.
The compilation booklet you have drawn attention to one imagines is just a selection from the ‘Sermons on Stones’ book.
The compilation booklet is also available on amazon.com.
Beloved Parmartha,
For your info, well before Amazon, Osho Viha was already stocking and selling ‘Sermons in Stone’ (for more than 20 years now), as well as ‘Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh on Basic Human Rights’. Why always promote and support Amazon?
Love,
Dhanyam
Sorry, Dhanyam.
SN does always support Viha wherever we can.
We think what happened was because SP said it so surely – that the book and booklet were not available – that it was not through the regular sources.
We will check his ‘facts’ more thoroughly in future.
LATER: BOTH the book and the booklet are available from Viha Connection. We apologise for not knowing this earlier. SP, you do make claims sometimes without the slightest bit of proper research, etc. and this undermines whatever you think in your own mind your one-man crusade is supposed to be doing.
Dates can vary.
Essence is who is going to implement or at least acknowledge that this book is one of the clear testimonies that Osho´s vision is to revamp all the aspects of human life. He is not a kind of uneducated yoga guru or another Indian master trying to teach meditation.
OSHO has a clear road map for the humanity. And I believe in my heart of the heart, it is the job of the disciples to make the path by taking stones and rocks away.
Oshoworld website has a human rights discourse on their website.
Again underlying matter is: Was Osho a wordsmith?
Something like:
‘A time has come when we can have a bicycle which can fly and also swim. When I say such things, don´t take it lightly. Existence speaks through me.’
Disciples’ farmost work is to cherish and nurture the elephant as it is. Any subtle means to project him as any other is what has happened with Osho. Therefore no productivity of any kind is possible. Compared to other sects and cults, Sannyas is walking like under the spell of psycho-pharmaceutical hallucinations.
This is the matter worth discussing, rather than hiding behind the great words.Yes…the words.
I thought you and your allies disapproved of “compilations”, young SP, and wanted them banned?!
The booklet, ‘Basic Human Rights’, to which you refer, is a compiled extract from the ‘Sermons in Stones’ book!
During that phase, Osho has instructed many compilations. For example, Rebel was in hardbound and also compiled version in paperback.
This booklet about human rights was also sent to the members of UN, if I remember correctly and it was decided to print this in all the major languages of the world.
Osho was targeting the whole world and had a clear view and also to show to the world through his people.
You will be surprised that on two occasions there was signature campaign on the instructions of Osho, once when an Indian doctor accused him of having no knowledge about Aids and secondly, when few people starting raising questions about the effects of Mystic Rose.
And I must say, from my side I have no allies. Both the sides are suffering from bally ailments. one side with too much gas, another with constipation. Situation is quite stiff, yet interesting.
1986, SP. Remember you that year or not?
Nothing to do with Osho, but those political people around him who you now so despise.
At the time, Osho’s reputation was in tatters following the Ranch, so what better than to send a booklet to UN arguing for Human Rights!
The European Union list 18 basic human rights and nine further important protocols. In my ‘day work’ they are pretty important as they represent the last line of appeal for some asylum seekers who regularly get ditched by the UK Home Office, even returning Tamils to hostile states like Sri Lanka, who then proceed to torture them again. Fortunately, such cases are often won, but not always.
Osho made ten recommendations for basic human rights. I don’t think. SP, that it was a great interest of his! As for Osho making some kind of blueprint for humanity, again you see the whole thing in covert political terms. Osho was a mystic who had done the ultimate, merging with Existence so he was no more there. That is his contribution to humanity – an example that such an enormity can be undertaken and completed.
All his talking about politics and much else etc. was to keep bums on seats – until his bliss could be transferred to all who could sense it.
“All his talking about politics and much else etc. was to keep bums on seats.”
Yes.
Vast amounts of what he said and did was just to get our attention. IMO.
Osho is what is usually called ‘idealistic’ in describing his version of the right to love.
The world has become even more ‘closed’ since he was around. Islam, for example, in major part treats women like chattels and has absolutely no respect for female self-determination and this has grown, not become less.
Anyone who, like Osho or Betrand Russell, attacks the institution of marriage is sadly playing with fire. Osho’s suggestion that communes or other collectivities can look after the children is admirable, and takes a sword to all the possessiveness that parents bully their children with, often for all their lives, but except in small islands of consciousness it clearly is not going to happen.
On the contrary, true free spirits are going to find it even harder to survive in a world that is now endlessly closing up and is the victim of various forms of theological totalitarianism.
I’m not sure if I’ve thought this through properly, but then you probably won’t either…
Or can’t…
QED: I have every right to be wrong and so have you…pass me the seaweed sandwiches….
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/virus-that-makes-humans-more-stupid-discovered-9849920.html
This seems apposite. Martyn,
The phrase quod erat demonstrandum (QED) is just a translation into Latin from the Greek ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι
Translating from the Latin into English yields, “what was to be demonstrated”; however, translating the Greek phrase ὅπερ ἔδει δεῖξαι produces a slightly different meaning. A better translation from the Greek would read, “The very thing it was required to have shown.”
PM, ever since you outsourced SN research to the Osho ‘Name of the Rose’ Centre on Mount Athos, it has left some of us feeling wiser,yet strangely out of our depth and like those sheep, loved by monks, high atop their windy scribend-cells, erm, ever so slightly, πατήσαμε.
And this is how the Republicans will enshrine their rights to be brain-dead and manically suicidal, thus consigning us all to Darwinism via Rambo.
Perhaps taking a ride on a comet out of here, will be the only thing left to do in just a few years from now…
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/12/us-china-climate-deal-boosts-global-talks-but-republicans-vow-to-resist
Parmartha, probably your indirect reference is to me, I have been vocal during & about the compilation of ‘India My Love’, with Swami Chaitanya Kirti in the late 90′s & few years back here on SN too, as I simply think & feel that the word-content of the Master should be preserved in its original form as much as possible after his physical departure. Of course, I am no authority on this/any subject.
Btw, I am as much an ally as you are to anyone!
Thanks, Kavita. No, not you in particular.
I am in the non-compilation camp myself. Also, I am a great fan of the early production of Osho’s books and would want them produced today to that quality and standard as they were from about 1977 to 1981. I worked in the Ashram silk screen dept. then and we used to individually make the covers of the books and with a lot of quality control! The job was not good from the point of view of the body, being exposed to all those inks, but I could always see the actual work lent itself very well to meditation and I met a lot of good people working there.
What Osho himself thought about compilation seems to be a bit of a mystery. I suspect that on something like the Human Rights booklet he agreed, but on the whole did not like it. After all, each lecture was always dedicated, as I remember, with some such words as “this discourse is complete unto itself”.
Also, what did Osho himself think of editing? Clearly, quite a lot of editing of text, including deletions etc. now goes on…What do you think?
Parmartha, during Osho’s life, if Public Relations ( threat to Osho’s life ) were the reasons for deletions & edits, then maybe we can excuse the disciples / persons concerned in this department, but now there is no threat of such kind. Now, I guess these disciples/persons who are taking responsibility in this department can learn a few lessons from Mr.J on ‘How to have a low profile and still be ‘.
Frankly, I find it absurd that in this time of technological expertise and facilities available to the Osho disciples in this field, why it is not possible to have all his words, the way Osho said it or the way it has been originally recorded with his accordance.
This is as much as I could come close to clarity.
Who is “Mr J”, Kavita?
SD, our fellow disciple, Swami Anand Jayesh – don’t tell me you needed me to spell it out!
All right then – I won’t!
You’re a darling, SD
Thanks, Kavita, for bothering to reply.
I think that SD makes a good witness about what Osho asked re his publications. He was, after all, an early Osho Editor and took Osho’s instructions directly.
I agree with you that, in any case, whatever ‘Publications Dept.’ does with his words, that the exact delivery of his words should be available for all who look for it, and that is quite technologically possible in today’s world.
The rhythm of what Osho said was not about the content only of what he was saying, but the underlying vibration of transmitting something beyond words. I imagine this sort of argument Swami Amrito and Jayesh find too esoteric, but for me it is all.
Parmartha: “I think that SD makes a good witness about what Osho asked re his publications. He was, after all, an early Osho Editor and took Osho’s instructions directly.”
SD certainly has an authority regarding this matter.
I do understand that – “The rhythm of what Osho said was not about the content only of what he was saying, but the underlying vibration of transmitting something beyond words.”
Thank you too.
As I’ve said here before, when I was an editor (in the early days of Pune 1), Osho gave crystal-clear instructions not to alter or edit his words, but to keep them as he originally spoke. He wanted their living flavour preserved, not made into something resembling ‘perfect’ academic English, or for the benefit, perhaps, of those with short attention spans.
On the other hand, in the media-proliferation of today’s world, where ‘information overload’ is pretty well the norm, I can see the point of ‘compilations’, which are aimed to provide the essence of Osho on specific topics. Perhaps these are particularly useful for people new to him, providing an introduction, a stimulus to discover more?
Youtube etc. videos perform a similar purpose – and maybe, seeing and hearing him, arguably more effectively, being, during the length of the extract, unedited?
But to abandon producing full-length ‘as spoken’ books of discourses would be going the wrong way. These play a key role in keeping Osho ‘alive’ for those who want him exactly ‘as is/was’ rather than a truncated, ‘custom-built’ version for the convenience of the contemporary mind and its headlong rush into never-ending ‘busy-ness’.
Also, I wanted to point out that Shantam is always criticising those who run the Resort/organisation these days.
But they are the people who like compilations and have organised a whole run of them.
So I found it a contradiction that he was arguing in favour of compilations when he seems to despise so much those who started them off !
Aren’t we all controversial in some way?!
No, I don’t think so, Kavita.
Well then, SD, I can’t think of anything right now.
QED is the coward’s way of saying: “I win.”
A terrifying thought, BV…the dreaded algae might have infected us all already..or will do soon…
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=S1QzWRbm1uc
“…better translation from the Greek would read, ‘The very thing it was required to have shown.’ ”
You prove to have the uncorrupted eyes of one of your forefathers, Parmartha, when you told the other days that he had been a famous detective in the ´Victorian Age´, didn´t you?
What´s also soothing pain is what you shared earlier yesterday evening about how things are going on so far this time. Always amazing how uncorruptedness has good side-effects for the Soul, even though from an outer side of view, nothing changes.
Such deserves a ´growth certificate´, although it doesn´t sell.
And thank you for this contribution.
Madhu
Oh Dear!
Others have only one religious book to chew, I have many.
How lucky I am. How lucky.
(From the diary of Swami Greecy Mousy)
Another remark fuelled by the loneliness of your life situation, Shantam.
Parmartha, I have basically not that much interest in the publications. I also believe copyrights and trademarks should remain in the hands of OSHO Foundation International.
I am against the high-headiness of the people who are running the show. For example, In less than a month, there is Osho Birthday. Who told to these people not to create festival atmosphere on this day? Whereas Osho himself created the event. How come the jokers start holding the hunter of the ringleader? (MOD: WHAT DOES THIS MEAN, SHANTAM?)
There are dozen of other such cases, where smarter ones have used all kind of plastic surgery on the acts of OSHO.
And has this produced better results?
It would seem, Shantam, the whole strategy of the powers-that-be is to avoid the possibility of turning Osho into a ‘personality cult’ where the man and his charisma becomes more important than the purpose of his work, what he was ‘pointing towards’.
It must be hard for those like yourself with a strong – in this context, one might say traditionalist – devotional bent, to accept what perhaps might seem almost ‘inhuman’, but do you see the logic behind such a policy?
While the master is alive, why not celebrate his birthday – he’s there, so why not do the ‘natural’ thing? After all, what a chance to imbibe his energy!
But after his death, something else, apparently inevitably, begins to creep in, insidiously undermining the integrity of the whole enterprise: people wanting to recreate him in the image of their own need, ie as a ‘god’ to worship. No doubting their sincerity, but unfortunately it tends to be drowned in sentimentality, and as such, the enemy of both love and truth.
That’s a significant cause of how corrupt religions are born, which it seems the people in charge are trying to cut at the roots.
For me, such events were like ‘icing on the cake’, enjoyable enough, ‘special’, of course, but not in any way ‘essential’. And after Osho’s death, even less significant.
Again, I ask you, Shantam, what would your life be like without this endless campaigning? And if you were to see and accept the point I’m making here? Perhaps you don’t want to face this question, regarding it as ‘irrelevant’? Or perhaps you simply can’t? Perhaps it’s too painful to contemplate? Only you know….
“QED is the coward’s way of saying: “I win” ”
And – do you remember, Bodhi Vartan, how He spoke about the issue of ´myths´ (with small letters) creation?
I have heard Him say, “most of the ´myths´ are often enough repeated lies”.
Nowadays, ´myths´ of this kind are created like anything.
That´s one (of the many) I love about this Master, even though it might be a specially hard one sometimes to digest.
Madhu
You are saying here, Shantam Prem:
“I am against the high-headiness of the people who are running the show. For example, In less than a month, there is Osho Birthday. Who told to these people not to create festival atmosphere on this day? Whereas Osho himself created the event. How come the jokers start holding the hunter of the ringleader?”
What you are saying here, is bullshit, Shantam Prem.
Celebrating Osho´s birthday in His time in the body has been coming up as a very natural (and also very beautiful Indian way too), which meant that Lovers of Wisdom and Lovers of One who embodies That just have been overflowing in Gratitude and Joy.
No need at all ´to run a show´, as you put it!
And no need to ´run a show´ for Lovers of Wisdom nowadays, who find their own ways to a Source.
-
If Osho were a taxi driver, He was asked one day by a sannyasin in sorrow, would he then be able to recognize Him.
Would you? Would I? Would anybody here?
He laughed and told one of His remarkable jokes…leaving all the space open..just the laughter remained.
Then Silence.
And also, I remember him having mentioned once about an important issue:
If one is not capable to celebrate one´s own Living (also dates), He said, how about the possibility to ´celebrate´ another…celebration day.
So there are more than few implications to such an issue.
Concerning book ´compilations`and ´editing´, I all feel for the Originals and the reason is that they show up also with some uncomfortable contexts of time fields of understandings and chronically connected stuff. That makes the miracle not smaller but more humanly complete, although it´s sometimes less easy to digest and may be needing added responses? Or commentaries of witnesses?
River is rivering across stones too, changes the landscape in a miraculous way, when it is not hindered or water dried out.
We are chatting by the river (although ´caravanserai´-spaces are more said to be in the desert lands…
And in rare moments
We are it -
The river….
Love,
Madhu
Disciples have become so wise, if the master comes again they can teach him some algebra, some geometry!
Madhu can be the reader in such university/multiversitySristhti*
* Hindi word meaning ‘universe’.
I am talking here, Shantam Prem, out of my very own experience – all the failures, all the errors and all the trials (in vain!) included.
I am alone – and the challenge is – that Love and Friendship, the way I knew it, IS NOT HAPPENING. So – my meditation schedule, day to day, hour to hour, night to night – is given on momentary base and is NOT comfortable AT ALL. I share that with you just now , to make it clear (if possible) – that no ´multiversitySristhi´ is on board!
The patience I often felt (you may doubt the latter) when I have been reading your posts (and some of the other ones too), comes out of that source – experiencing my own very dark and sometimes darkened moments and living them.
The other element of source I am aware of is my Gratefulness for the Miracle, having been able to meet such a Being and having been able to join His ´caravan´.
That – inspite of ´me´ – has been a point of no return, and some of that may be mirrored when I sit here to write a ´letter´…
And what about you?
Madhu
P.S. for you, Shantam Prem:
I really love what Parmatha contributed altogether on this issue (´Human Rights´and more, and the changes all over the global fields, also connected in a way with our SN issues, and I want to recommend to you to read that again).
As my contributions come from a woman´s side, much I could add
´de plus´ to Parmartha’s efforts I want to spare you from.
Thanks, Madhu.
I suppose because my day job is in a field where Basic Human Rights are endlessly transgressed I am a bit more down to earth about these things and their idealisms.
I sometimes feel that some, but by no means all, commentators here are living in quite a narrow world, whilst more exposure to being in the marketplace and real world would help their growth – rather than the narrow quarrels here.
I am currently working in a literal marketplace every Sunday. I love the whole process: setting up my stall, early morning contact with other stallholders, making it clear that this is my space etc. Then the show begins. The stall provides a seat to watch it. Shoppers begin to arrive. Each person you meet is somehow a reflection of what you are putting out. Most of the vibes are positive. Once in a while a nego.
Strange thing is, for me at least, it is the more uncomfortable exchanges that remain for sometime. Those are the ones that remind you that there is tweaking to be done on your tuner.
Taking it to the marketplace was one of Osho’s greatest pieces of advice. Stay in the marketplace long enough and it always comes to you that you don’t know everything and there is always something new to be learned. And who knows, you might even make a few bucks.
Global world is really facing problems. We can teach them.
Join week-long group, ‘Subway of Love’.
Someone close to Osho will lead the group!
Chud Meister, why be concerned with the global world and its problems, when you obviously have so many problems much closer to home? Your whole attitude is one of external changes, which even if they miraculously came about would make no difference whatsoever to how you are experiencing life.
You are someone who will always hop from one external problem to another, endlessly, never pausing for a moment to look at the fact that it is your attitude that lies at the heart of most problems. You are majoring in distraction.
Lokesh, use some brain man. It will help you to understand the subtle difference between a satire, irony and a statement.
Seems like much construction work is left undone after the death of hired architects!
P.S: For an exercise, let me know what you understand from the last sentence.
Chudo, there is nothing subtle to be addressed in your comment and I would hardly describe it as satire…maybe fartfire. What you are missing is that I was addressing you.
As for making an exercise out of understanding your pedestrian metaphor…Well, I have to put on my thinking cap, ehm…erh…does it mean that you have your fat head stuck so far up your arse that you are completely blind and stupid? Remember now, that is just me guessing.
Puzzle for the intelligent ones:
“I have so many problems. I am lost.”
Someone was crying and talking with himself in his room.
No one bothered.
Weeping became louder and veiling too, “I am looser, i am a looser!”
To hear this, elder brother put the book on the side table and shouted, “No you are not a looser. You are not. It is me. It is me!”
Puzzle is, which book elder brother was reading?
Cor blimey, guv, I do like a good puzzle, me (like that Viktorian copper geezer Parmarfur goes on abaht)…
Erm, er…’Emtee, Loose and Nachural’, by erm, er…Ach Arya Rajneez?
(MOD: Cor blimey = Blind me, Christ, guv = governor/boss, copper = policeman, geezer = man, abaht – about. NOT SURE RE Parmafur).
Perfectly correct, Shantambhai!
Disciples become too wise to use geometry and algebra to measure size and weight of floaters left in Samadhi-cum-public toilet by general of Sannyas army, Jayesh, then toilet cleaner-cum-footsoldier with bogbrush in hand must use irony and satire like dead architect with structural problems in the brain designing new building!
And basic human rights in Sannyas toilet must be implemented by irony of jokers and hunters of ringleaders with plastic surgery sitting in foreign country, visiting mixed naked sauna with no middle-class and secure family life, high-headed ringleaders taking prozac and shouting, “You are not loser. It is me. I am loser! I am lost!”
Yahoo!
“Floater”? Is that what you call a sannyasin in total let-go?
Yes, definitely.
It`s from an old set of talks on Taoism:
‘Taoists: Floaters In The Watercourse Way’.
Or maybe from the old darshan diary:
‘Relax, Don`t Go Round The Bend, Just Float’.
Funeeee!
That´s not funny, Anand Yogi, even though, if especially your last paragraph could be ´close to inconvenience of truth´. I wonder what your writing place looks like…and you yourself look like…
Novemberblues about the anonymity of the NET…here at my side. Alone.
“If losers are supposed to win this game, I bet I am going to be the one. I will float if needed, I will drown if needed.” (Modern day seeking)
“If by dying one gets the Paradise, we are ready. Bomb us, you assholes.”
(Jihadi style seeking)
Keep taking the pills, bro`.
Frank has written from his bed in the old people´s caring home, “Keep taking the pills, bro`.”
No, sir, I won´t steal your pills.
That`s jolly reassuring punkah wallah, as you just can`t get the staff these days…the last chap we had here tried to make out he was terribly religious but he ended up making off with all my Prozac…
We finally caught the blighter…sitting at home on his computer in his underpants, whacking himself off all day…dreadfully messy business…
Now that you`re here, boy, please empty my incontinence pants – they`re in a dreadful state since I lost my religion, and don’t forget to plunge my WC, there`s a couple of floaters the size of the Titanic in there…
Oh and, bearer, wheel me onto the verandah and fetch me a gin and tonic to go with my tablets while you`re at it, there`s a good chap….