Beyond Action and Inaction ?

Oliver Burkeman:
The art of Taking Action. Or Not
(from the Guardian’s recent Health and Well Being Section)

Worthy we thought of comment/SN

When publishing a book in Britain or the US about eastern spiritual practices – meditation, yoga, reiki – there’s an unwritten rule as to the cover design: it must feature a lotus flower, pebble, clear sky, still lake or smiling statue. (You can generate titles by randomly combining those words, too: Smiling Pebble In A Clear Sky: The Art Of Meditation. Out now in all good bookshops!)

images

These cliches reflect the widespread assumption that the traditions of south-east Asia are all about slowing down, looking inwards and cultivating calm: the things you do, in other words, when you’re desperate for a break from the pace of modern (implicitly, western) life. But for Gregg Krech, an expert on Japanese psychology, that’s only half the story. Look closely at such philosophies, he argues in a new book, The Art Of Taking Action, and you’ll find they’re full of practical advice for getting things done. True, his book’s cover shows some bamboo strips by a pond, but there’s nothing so placid about what’s inside.

 

The problem with the usual up-and-at-’em approach to motivation is, in Krech’s view, that it’s far too hung up on the importance of being excited about what you’re doing, while avoiding the discomfort associated with boring, difficult or unglamorous work – far too hung up, in short, on emotions in general. If you see life that way, the cure for procrastination is clear: change your feelings of reluctance to feelings of enthusiasm. But trying to control emotions “is like trying to push back the water of the Kamo river upstream”, says the Japanese psychiatrist Shoma Morita, who is central to Krech’s book: it’s impossible.  Morita’s alternative, “arugamama”, is to stop fighting uncomfortable feelings, accept them, and do stuff anyway – far more practical than being enslaved to the emotions of the moment. Krech quotes the meditation teacher Eknath Easwaran: “The statement we hear so often – ‘I like it, so I’m going to do it’ – is a confession that a person is not free.”
It’s eye-opening to think of excitement this way: not as the thing we should all seek in life, but as a mildly embarrassing affliction that’s as likely to distract you from what matters as guide you towards it. “The only way to really deal with the problem of excitement,” Krech writes, “is to stop becoming dependent on it”: it’s after excitement fades that you discover what you’re made of. This needn’t mean resigning yourself to a relationship or job you hate; it just means not relying on excitement, or the avoidance of discomfort, to decide what to do next.
Life (to paraphrase the Buddha) is inherently unsatisfactory. And that’s liberating: you never have to wonder if the path you’re on will lead to unbroken thrills and zero frustrations, because you can be certain it won’t.

 

In an old Zen parable quoted by Krech, a monk asks his superior what to do about being too hot. His reply: “When it is hot, let it be so hot that it kills you.” Not literally: that’d be a rubbish productivity tip. But spending less time battling discomfort? That’s a productivity tip to beat them all. To be able to do what needs doing, whether or not you feel like it, is pretty close to a superpower.

This entry was posted in Discussion. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Beyond Action and Inaction ?

  1. Arpana says:

    After moving to London in 1984 I hit a really low patch. Felt absolutely stuck and made a decision to do vipassana every day, because that seemed like the only viable option at the time, and that I would keep doing so until it dropped, no matter what I went through, and I went through hell at times, but kept going.

    One of the ways I got through was that I gave myself permission to quit, but only when I was feeling ok. Wasn’t allowed to on a downer. Took a year. Made new foundations, Foundations for a life based on Kaizan if you will, rather than bull at a gate, and have never looked back since.

  2. Parmartha says:

    There seems a difference to me between a choice between action and inaction, which in the best public schools (which I say tongue-in-cheek) is always seen as a matter of ‘character’ and training one’s character, and that being proactive is always better than being ‘lazy’!

    Many poetry writers in those sad schools would disagree, including the famous!

    This, however, seems a different type of matter to going beyond action and inaction both, which as I understand it, is the mystical position.

Leave a Reply