Been going through a darshan diary.
You know, to me, feels like being in his physical
presence.
Everything he says seems so alive, so in the moment.
Sometimes addressed to me, sometimes to others.

If fighting over what Osho meant by this or that really helped anyone become more free, then we should all start to discuss much more.

If only being free frees, then lets just be free and enjoy life. When you have to fight for something like Osho’s will or legacy or Samadhi, then already the real freedom is lost. You are chasing a ghost. The replica guru’s emerge who mimic the real masters echo.

The quality of who Osho is has to become authentic in you. If you recognize his authenticity then you have to flow towards your own. I find it highly unlikely that it is authentic for anyone to follow and fight for the words of a dead master.

If Osho has taught you your real dance; I believe the only solution is to dance and not fight for the copyrights of his dance moves or mimic his style or rhythm.

In YOUR POSTS here I see mostly rubbish, Ekantam.

Ok, now?

You write rubbish, you’ll get what it deserves.

Action and reaction, aka karma.

Got it now?

Anyone who so fervently resists criticism by taking such a negative stance towards what is pretty basic psychology reveals both a profound insecurity and a measure of philistine ignorance – not to mention a deficiency of common sense – that would be more fitting to the Middle Ages than to these times.

My guess is that as a presumably upper middle-class Indian doctor (if indeed that’s what you are – and I still have certain doubts about that) enjoying a high social status over there, you’ve lived in a sort of ‘ivory tower’ most of your adult life, immune from criticism, automatically ‘respected’, without necessarily deserving such ‘reverence’. Thus, you don’t take kindly to criticism, whatever the issue, whatever the source.

If you imagine it’s a realistic option to simply ‘drop mind’ without a considerable measure of ongoing work upon your own psyche and its mental and emotional patterns and attachments, as if you’re suddenly going to be totally ‘liberated’ for ever (and, in your fantasy, enjoy its concomitant cachet of status and power?!) then you’re sadly mistaken. (As is Swami R, who likes to peddle such nonsense and who, of course, you like to copy).

And in your particular case the need for such basic work is so blindingly obvious to all who have so far commented here that, as you’ve been regularly informed, it’s simply laughable to see how you cling to your delusions of spiritual grandeur.

As for ‘innocence and beauty of heart’, well, I suggest that your outpourings – eg your recently published ‘death-wish’ for and ‘spiritual superiority’ over your adversaries (to name just two of many instances) are hardly evidence of such qualities, so let’s add spiritual hypocrisy to the list of aspects of your psyche that require close examination.

And what sort of insufferably self-regarding prig boasts about how ‘innocent’ and ‘silent’ he is – or imagines he is – compared to another? ‘No mind’? Pull the other one, guv!

You ask why I choose to respond to your nonsense if I find it so laughable? I’ll tell you why, Ekantam, it’s because I also find such arrogant delusion thoroughly offensive and as such, deserving of challenge as well as derision.

As far as I am concerned,
I appreciate innocence of heart,
silence of being,
I just shut off my mind,
when i encounter heart and being!
I do not let dogs of
my mind and its psychoanalytic ability,
bark and bite into heart and being!

There you are different Satyadeva!
Your dogs of
your mind and its psychoanalytic ability,
they have become rogue dogs,
they just jump upon innocent hearts and silent beings,
they bark and bite,
they have not left even Osho,
they have not left even your innocence and silence,
they are dogs actually,
but they have become wiser than Osho,
they give you power to put down others,
but in the end,
they make you a fool,
they keep you hovering around
sickness of others,
even in the name of exposing others,
they make you lose out
on the innocence of your own heart
and silence of your own being!
Your mind and its psychoanalytic
ability are basically dogs
interested in filth of others!

Satyadeva!
Pay attention to my posts!
You will never find my dogs of
mind and its psychoanalytic ability
jumping on the innocence of heart and silence of being of others!
My dogs are dogs but not rogue like yours!

And yes,
I have the courage to
post my innocence of heart and
silence of being,
knowing fully well they are vulnerable,
they make me sound cuckoo!
But they are beautiful,
shantam prem gets that often,
hence his appreciation of me!

I use my dogs
of mind and its psychoanalytical ability,
on those rogue dogs
of mind and its psychoanalytical ability,
who jump upon the innocence of heart and silence of being!

So Satyadeva,
so far it started with your rogue dogs
jumping upon outpourings of innocence of my heart and silence of being!
Since then it was my dogs versus
your rogue dogs!

I challenge you,
just let innocence of your heart
and silence of your being
express themselves on this
forum of SN,
then you will realize
what is the difference between
bodh ekantam and satyadeva!

Time to self-collapse those delusions of grandeur. But you wouldn’t understand that, of course.

Ever laughed at how absurd you and your pretensions are?

Thought not.