Comments on: Osho and Baba Hari Giri

By: kusum

kusum — Thu, 29 Dec 2016 10:36:34 +0000

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8cLMyDaOlo

By: madhu dagmar frantzen

madhu dagmar frantzen — Wed, 28 Dec 2016 05:34:04 +0000

Did you ever watch a doc, Kusum, shedding some light about the art of ´debate competitions´, one to one and face-to-face – out in a courtyard of a Tibetan monastery? Not unlike the setting of the ´ Who-Is-In?´ group?

Switching partners to the tune of a bell. Looks like a dance then, the whole body is involved. When the debate is finished, sometimes ripples of laughter.

Some bricks of the mind walls may have been taken out, examined, controversially investigated, thrown in insubstantial ‘ping-pong’ accompanied by passionate gestures into the air.

A play, not to be taken seriously (in the end), by the final tune of the gong.

Has been infectious – we the audience watching and listening as in a cinema in the West have been laughing too, having been having a chance of watching a practice to disidentify with the mind, while using it.

The virtual stage of an online chat would give us theoretically all possibilities of practising the latter.
It does not happen though. Or very very rarely happens. Obviously.

Maybe the reason is that we are not in consent to a frame and some rudimentary rules of respecting each other as sentient beings? Or can´t hold the line of a topic? In agreement to hold the line?

Mostly just ´rapping our way through, not unlike the Pink Floyd album, ´The Wall´?

That´s (necessary) kids play.

Of grown-ups?

Madhu

By: kusum

kusum — Tue, 27 Dec 2016 20:00:14 +0000

Even in the universities, during debate competition students also criticise other competitors in the debate. And Osho was a professor with brilliant mind so naturally he could argue very clearly.

By: Arpana

Arpana — Tue, 27 Dec 2016 12:00:25 +0000

You did a fine job, Sir.

By: satyadeva

satyadeva — Tue, 27 Dec 2016 11:43:55 +0000

I edited the first edition (’75), but after a while other editions listed a different editor. Once I did a fairly quick check and noticed no changes to the text although aspects I wasn’t involved in (presentation, cover etc.) had been altered.

By: Ashok

Ashok — Tue, 27 Dec 2016 02:22:37 +0000

Thank you for all of this, Mr Martin!

Good stuff, eh?

By: madhu dagmar frantzen

madhu dagmar frantzen — Mon, 26 Dec 2016 21:32:03 +0000

Precious.

By: sannyasnews

sannyasnews — Mon, 26 Dec 2016 21:13:23 +0000

Funny, I think that Satyadeva edited this edition.

He will no doubt confirm or not!

By: anand yogi

anand yogi — Mon, 26 Dec 2016 17:10:01 +0000

Perfectly correct, Shantambhai!

Again the Scottish and Anglo-Saxon baboons of her Majesty show how they have abused the freedom that Osho has given them by, instead of meditating and following master`s guidelines, they have sat about doing nothing and spent their life joking and fucking a boot!

As Madhu makes abundantly clear in her catchphrase::
IT IS NOT FUNNY!

Those who understand how religions evolve know that Guru Nanak never fucked a boot! Does the declaration of an item of holey underwear as a holy icon sound like the idea of someone who was fucking a boot?

Fucking a boot in such places as Edinburgh may be deemed amusing, but in mighty Bhorat we frown upon such behaviour!

Shantambhai may have fucked a boot a bit in pumping phase (88-90),but only in service of higher cause of contemporary spiritual movement, and his fucking a boot has created situation where holy Amma Merkel is making regular charity payments for sponsoring religion of true believers of mighty Bhorat online!

Yahoo!
Hari Om!

By: sw. veet (francesco)

sw. veet (francesco) — Mon, 26 Dec 2016 12:50:36 +0000

@Prem Martyn

I agree with you, there’s nothing sadder than those who do not know how to cry, and consequently, laugh.

It seems to me that we are on another type of ship, it depends on ‘how far sailors can fly’.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzCkOnGfkGg

Love,