Comments on: An Osho Koan

By: satyadeva

satyadeva — Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:18:48 +0000

And now for something extremely serious…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=L_jXmKszEdk#!

By: prem martyn

prem martyn — Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:14:38 +0000

excellent… Satyadeva…

obviously he was wishing you more of the same through the ethers via me , sannyas news, you tube and discussions on truth with Mr Shantam

what a marvellous story.. nice to be ‘ in tune…’

synchronicitea anyone…..

By: satyadeva

satyadeva — Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:35:40 +0000

Perhaps you might find this little ditty conducive to a spot of self-reflection, Mr Martyn…

The video cannot be shown at the moment. Please try again later.

I was something of a fan of Ivor Cutler from age 17, when I first heard him on the radio. At that age I even wrote him an attempt at a humorous letter, to which he responded…

Then, well over two decades later, while working as a Christmas postman in London, I delivered his mail and one day he came to the door and took it from me. He looked well and happy, far more robust than in these clips.

As for the Tea koan…

The video cannot be shown at the moment. Please try again later.

By: prem martyn

prem martyn — Wed, 27 Mar 2013 01:38:45 +0000

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2299288/Fun-flirtation-bridal-market-young-Roma-women-meet-future-husbands–price-right.html

Shantam and Satyadeva home movie….After a failure to spit into their hands and to exchange a trusting handshake, prevents these two gypsy travelling seekers from settling a deal and a price on a real woman with large chu chus and hairy bazongas under the arms. Later the sound of Satyadeva on his old Indian squeeze box , singing the praises of consciousness to the great goddess could be heard from Sannyas News Shrine room…..

The video cannot be shown at the moment. Please try again later.

By: satyadeva

satyadeva — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:41:35 +0000

No, Shantam, in the first instance it depends how much you actually know about the matter or individual in question. You know nothing, therefore any remarks you make about it are, by definition, ignorant and therefore worthless.

By: satyadeva

satyadeva — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 22:36:43 +0000

Who mentioned “adoration”? As I said, it would help if you actually knew what you’re talking about, Shantam. If you have to comment, do some research, check your facts! Then perhaps you wouldn’t feel quite the same apparent need to make the sort of gratuitously ignorant, patronising remarks that appear in your first paragraph.

As for who’s “realised”, “fully realised”, “enlightened”, “fully enlightened”, “awakened”, “fully awakened”, “half-awake”, “asleep”, “fully asleep”, or “fully asleep and snoring”, I’m afraid I must declare that I personally place you in the last category. Sorry, but I’m the ‘God of Truth’ so I know all about such matters.

By: shantam prem

shantam prem — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:39:00 +0000

SD, With due respect to the sanccity of your adoration for Ms. Meera; many of us need someone real or areal to hold unto. It is human.
What makes me sarcastic is the used of adjectives like Fully awakened, fully realised, Fully enlightend kind of terms for some individuals we adore. More or less it is perception and not reality.
Horse of one cannot be a donkey for others, but fully awakened of one can be not so awakened for many others..

By: shantam prem

shantam prem — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 21:13:55 +0000

Who is ignorant, who is wise?
It all depends upon the equation of need in proportion to other person´s authority.

By: satyadeva

satyadeva — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 18:01:49 +0000

Well, Shantam, what I’m saying to you is simply that talking from actual experience is far more convincing than coming from utter ignorance.

As you know nothing of the matter, you magnify your foolishness – most laughably – by saying anything at all.

By: Arpana

Arpana — Tue, 26 Mar 2013 17:58:49 +0000

http://arts.brighton.ac.uk/__data/assets/image/0003/32916/472.jpg