Comments on: Is it OK to disagree with Osho?

By: Nirvan

Nirvan — Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:36:58 +0000

To agree or disagree is to be caught up in the duality of mind. In case this is new information for you, sannyas is all about THE ENERGY. The words are only to destroy your attachment to your mindset. That said, I’ve always loved listening to Osho.

By: prem martyn

prem martyn — Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:22:58 +0000

is it ok with who ?

i asked the woman at the launderette the other day… it went something like this

Me : Excusez moi

Launderette Lady : Oui

Avez vous le ok pour le desagreable de Osh avec la plume de ma tante pour le beard ? Merci ?

LL: Quoi ?

Je avoir beaucoup de le question …oui ou non est OK?? Sprechen sie bitte und machen sie schnelle.. ja er oui ?

LL : Si vous ne etre careful je appel la police

Alors je take that comme une Non ! Merci.

LL: (avec telephone) Bonsoir monsieur Constable, ici la launderette …je avoir un autre Osho nutter en la grand confusion, arrivez avec velocite toute suite.

and so we say au revoir to la question et le puzzle de le advanced reader sur le News de Sannyase. Merci.

By: Parmartha

Parmartha — Tue, 22 Jan 2013 20:02:08 +0000

The original question itself is dumb.
Osho was not a seminar leader, or someone like Bertrand Russell orchestrating different opinions, and agreeing or disagreeing like 20 year old students talking through the night, thinking they are getting closer to some “truth” through argument. An okay activity for those of a certain age, etc, but a long way short of mystic maturity.
He was a mystic. He used words simply to intice to something much greater and beyond ordinary imagination – and beyond the ordinary world of human mind…. just a taste of what he was about when sitting with him was enough to take this question away for ever.

By: shantam prem

shantam prem — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:17:22 +0000

One small paragraph from a newsreport made me thought about our own world.
What is true for Congress party, fits with our Alma mater too.
Masters like Osho have all the right to get all the devotion..all yes osho yes…but not the functionaries…

Anyone hoping to transform the Congress Party must necessarily be capable of breaking from its toxic tradition of authoritarianism and sycophancy, of making a cool-headed assessment of the weaknesses of its past leadership.

By: Sw Bodhi Vartan

Sw Bodhi Vartan — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:01:28 +0000

shantam prem says:
Tibetan Book of The Dead”, the guy specifically gives instructions on how to reincarnate oneself into the body of one’s choice, and the parents of one’s choice..

A good exercise is to meditate upon your current incarnation and choice of parents as a conscious decision that was made by you in your previous incarnation …

Ducking!!!

By: satyadeva

satyadeva — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:57:49 +0000

Most impressive, babasv…Clearly, you have charted realms that I’ve only heard or read about…

How come though, you’re so often so bloody angry?

By: shantam prem

shantam prem — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 07:24:39 +0000

Tibetan Book of The Dead”, the guy specifically gives instructions on how to reincarnate oneself into the body of one’s choice, and the parents of one’s choice..

Most of us books are being read by the senstive western souls..If we go with the maxim, “Grass is greener on the other side of the fence, Tibetan Budduism will have sharp intelligent arrivals..who have learnt much being Christians in their past life..
As far as Tibetans are concerned..they can learn how to be born in UK, Canada, USA. On a deeper level, their soul may be craving for latest electronic gadgets!

By: babasvetlana

babasvetlana — Mon, 21 Jan 2013 04:01:35 +0000

so i take it S.D. you never had any real “experiences” from doing meditations, or “visions”, or “astral projections”. Too bad, if you had you’d know immediately what “oneself” is. To be brief- the life energies that are released when one leaves the body, and the type of energies depends on your state of awareness, or as i call it “life radiance”. If you were a mass murder or a very hateful person at the moment of death, your “life radiant” energy would be much like a viscous animal, if you were a very loving person or a meditative person, your energy would be more “angelic”, or “buddha”-like…it’s a focused collection of physical /mental/astral energies…. similar to auras that we have surrounding us during our time on this earth.. that’s the best i can do… if you’re curious go find out for yourself– self-discovery, pally. The Tibetan Book of the Dead was made for most Tibetans, including regular schmucks, whether a person got anything from it was indeed up to themselves and their curiosity and intelligence level. My opinion of it and i’ve stated it here several times, is that it was made so people would keep coming back as human beings, not advancing to a so-called higher spiritual plane in the next life, again, it’s up to each individual after careful reading to notice this, so the lama who wrote it, was more interested in preserving his so-called “higher” place in existence, and not helping the general human population in shedding our “animal” energies…kind of like “this is my turf, go somewhere else. So, i kind of frown on those moron tibetan buddhists, Dalai Lama included.. they’re self centered and selfish and use “Freedom for Tibet” as a front so they can keep their dumb jobs as monks and lamas. Class dismissed.. for the year!!

By: prem martyn

prem martyn — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:52:22 +0000

frank, everyone is in adept these days…. i blame it on giving irresponsible spiritual kidologies too much easy credit…

By: frank

frank — Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:06:25 +0000

i`m not a re-incarnation man myself,and i`ve cancelled my subscription to the resurection,but existence itself can also be seen as “laughably absurd”,in fact its hard not to.

and i think the distinction between “laymen” and “adepts”is a bit dated these days.
most of the adepts i`ve come across have been up for a lay..