Comments on: Boulder Late 1985

By: madhu dagmar frantzen

madhu dagmar frantzen — Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:47:30 +0000

Hi Arpana,

Not at all hard for me to believe and to perceive you amongst friends. This website here is just a tiny, tiny particle of Life as such. Your life as well as mine.

And yes – you are right when presuming that I sometimes would very much appreciate more of the ´give-and-take´ re sharing here.

True.

Thank you for sharing.

Madhu

By: Tan

Tan — Thu, 27 Jul 2017 17:25:27 +0000

Thanks, Madhu, to say what you feel about this disgraceful photo of Osho, which looks like it is a cover for a book.

Who created this photo is sick. No wonder why the Poona guys are so strict with everything about Osho.

Cheers! XX

By: Arpana

Arpana — Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:23:00 +0000

I particularly like them because despite some major difficulties they’ve experienced in life, they just rise to the challenge, rarely complain and don’t seem to think they’re exceptionally hard done by. (Despite not being sannyasins, or into such matters, they seem to understand lots of people have hard times, not just them).

By: Arpana

Arpana — Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:06:22 +0000

And I apologise for going out and enjoying myself with a few people I really like being with. (No connection to Osho either, apart from the fact they’ve been good friends to me for years and also good friends to others. Mind you, hard though it may be to believe, they think/feel I’ve been a good friend to them, friendship being about give and take).

By: Arpana

Arpana — Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:58:38 +0000

Thank you, Madhu.
I bask in the warm glow of your loving condemnation.

By: madhu dagmar frantzen

madhu dagmar frantzen — Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:45:18 +0000

@ Arpana ( at 11:14 am)

“You’re not a simpleton, Madhu. Nobody with as many expectations as you can call themselves such a thing.”

Oh yes I can, and I never said that Tan´s word-creation was ´a thing´, Arpana. I spoke of ´familiarity´ and, when I recall just the very last hours, I felt more than familiar with Tan´s estimation of a photo-shop-digital compilation.

She said ´wrong´ and I subscribe to that. And it´s more than is to be seen by the eyes, and at the same time ´simple´.

You well recovered after a fabulous dinner invitation?

Madhu

By: frank

frank — Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:00:36 +0000

I think you should give Bodhi Harrangue a little more credit.

Apart from having a full collection of back copies of Osho Nursery Rhymes (ONR), I hear he is a prime mover and shaker in the Osho Nursery And Neo Idiotic Spiritual Tartufferie scene
(ONANIST).

By: Arpana

Arpana — Thu, 27 Jul 2017 10:14:06 +0000

You’re not a simpleton, Madhu. Nobody with as many expectations as you can call themselves such a thing.

By: Lokesh

Lokesh — Wed, 26 Jul 2017 18:43:10 +0000

Don’t take it personally, Simond. The closest Bodhi Warton ever got to Osho was buying the dunce’s special edition of Osho Nursery Rhymes, or the ONR as regular readers call it. He has a picture of Osho namasteing above his bed, to remind him that he does not need to lie down to be fast asleep.

By: bodhi heeren

bodhi heeren — Wed, 26 Jul 2017 15:51:07 +0000

Since you and Lokesh are soul brothers presenting the exact same view of Sannyas and Osho, why on Earth should you NOT like him?

The only difference between you two seems to me that Lokesh is the sarcastic type, always trying to be ‘funny’ while you, Simond, are the serious kind, always trying to sound authentic and ‘honest’