Comments on: Siddharta’s Movie from the Ranch

By: satchit

satchit — Fri, 07 Jul 2017 16:45:22 +0000

“Actually, Satchit, I reckon that it is far more likely that you are now desperately obfuscating to try and mask the fact that you were fool enough to put unspoken words into Osho’s mouth. Words that you thought would make you look deep and profound, but sadly, only made you look shallow and pretentious.”

Has it any value for me how you perceive me from your corner? Not really.

Anyway, thanks for the conversation.

By: swami anand anubodh

swami anand anubodh — Fri, 07 Jul 2017 14:35:15 +0000

Actually, Satchit, I reckon that it is far more likely that you are now desperately obfuscating to try and mask the fact that you were fool enough to put unspoken words into Osho’s mouth. Words that you thought would make you look deep and profound, but sadly, only made you look shallow and pretentious.

I am happy for you to have any last word on this matter, as I have every confidence in the followers of SN to know within themselves which of us has ‘wrong understanding’.

By: satchit

satchit — Fri, 07 Jul 2017 12:49:28 +0000

“It seems, Satchit, that your “playfulness” has a very short shelf life.”

It seems, Anubodh, you have a wrong understanding of “playfulness”. It is not always fluffy and nice.

What is this comment-game here on SN? Has it a goal? I don’t think so – do you? So it is a play.

Sense of humour is also involved by talking about news from 1984.

By: madhu dagmar frantzen

madhu dagmar frantzen — Fri, 07 Jul 2017 10:23:04 +0000

@Kusum (5 July, 2017 at 12:43 pm – no response button, addressing me):
“Be aware but you do not have to be paranoid about everything. Also you do not have to be too literal.”

Easy to admit, Kusum, that you as an entity here show neither any trace of paranoia, nor anything resembling being ´literal´.

Your contribution one or two liners leave more the impression of a golem – google-play entity in the inter-net (priesthood´s section) than of a living Being.

Nothing can be done about it, but sharpening the senses and the view to discern the false from the true, the artificial from the natural and living, and all that is Life is bound to be imperfect and has a pulse, even remarkable and recognisable through the lines.

Kusum (6 July, 2017 at 11:53 pm – no response button either):
“Madhu, Soul world & Business world are different territories.”

No, they are not ´Kusum´, but there are more than a few humans who lost their soul-connection meanwhile (or maybe even never had a glimpse of recognition of one).

Quite a while ago I watched a serial movie production which worked through the issue in story-telling about the encounter of artificial intelligence clones and humans. Amazing plots…quite contemporary. The artificial intelligence clones have been labelled by the production script teams as “REAL humans”.

Was inspiring to go deeper looking at what a human living Source is all about, ´Kusum´.

Better not to flood me as a receiver with and from a priesthood algorithm artificial ´intelligence´section in two-liners, Kusum.

I prefer a human throbbing heart, recognisable – what to do…?

Madhu

By: kusum

kusum — Thu, 06 Jul 2017 22:53:15 +0000

Madhu, Soul world & Business world are different territories.

By: swami anand anubodh

swami anand anubodh — Thu, 06 Jul 2017 22:44:36 +0000

It seems, Satchit, that your “playfulness” has a very short shelf life.

By: satchit

satchit — Thu, 06 Jul 2017 15:19:33 +0000

“In your haste to dig yourself into a deeper hole, you have neglected to realise that I was merely repeating what Osho said happened. Which is in stark contrast to your naive ‘fantasy’ Osho quote, and so you are feeling a little ‘miffed’. For the record: I think it very unlikely he was poisoned. Other than that, I don’t care.”

So you belong to the category of people who are good in projecting?
You know exactly that I did “neglect” and how I “feel”? Funny, old rabbit Anubodh.

By: Lokesh

Lokesh — Thu, 06 Jul 2017 15:10:53 +0000

Cool, Madhu.

By: madhu dagmar frantzen

madhu dagmar frantzen — Thu, 06 Jul 2017 14:46:22 +0000

Nice to read your considered response, Lokesh, especially the opening lines:
“Quite remarkable that a movement based around a teaching that says the here and now is the place to be, has so much nostalgia and sentimentality for the past.”

And what I also loved is one of the rare ´nuggets when you share about your relating with´your best reflection´, as you did put it, and your exchange : ” “Is that just me being cynical?” So I went to my best reflection and asked her what she thought. “A bit of both, I guess.” ”

Refreshing read – and thank you for that.

Madhu

By: swami anand anubodh

swami anand anubodh — Thu, 06 Jul 2017 13:13:34 +0000

Satchit,

In your haste to dig yourself into a deeper hole, you have neglected to realise that I was merely repeating what Osho said happened. Which is in stark contrast to your naive ‘fantasy’ Osho quote, and so you are feeling a little ‘miffed’. For the record: I think it very unlikely he was poisoned. Other than that, I don’t care.