Comments on: Attempt to get Osho’s Will out of Spainish legal authorities

By: Kavita

Kavita — Mon, 26 Sep 2016 03:00:41 +0000

“…as many seem to believe, then why shouldn’t one be able to produce two identical signatures?”

I guess that’s because even in Nature too, no identical twins are totally identical even though they appear to be.

By: swamishanti

swamishanti — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 14:13:05 +0000

Didn’t Osho cough up a golden egg at one stage?
Ah no, that was the one with the Afro.

By: Arpana

Arpana — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 14:04:57 +0000

All men DREAM, but not equally.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity.
But the dreamers of the day are dangerous men for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.
This I did.

Thomas Edward Lawrence

By: frank

frank — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 13:30:13 +0000

It`s time for the Sunday afternoon singalong at the Orange Sunshine Retirement Home:

“Sail me on a silver sun `till I know that I`m free
Show me that I`m everywhere and get me home for tea….”

By: swami anand anubodh

swami anand anubodh — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 13:28:51 +0000

I see an ‘ironic paradox’:

For the Indians to win their court case their handwriting experts are going to say that a human being is not capable of producing two identical signatures. And because the two are identical, one is a forgery.

Thus confirming that Osho was only human.

Yet should the Indians win, and maybe even gain control of the Resort, then I would imagine they would be seeking to elevate Osho to the status of a ‘Holy Man’, thus making the Ashram a worthy place of worship and pilgrimage.

In which case, it would seem to me that if Indian Holy men are capable of ‘coughing up’ gold jewellery (among other miracles!), as many seem to believe, then why shouldn’t one be able to produce two identical signatures?

By: satyadeva

satyadeva — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:59:25 +0000

In dreams, Shantam – yours, apparently, and the Muslims’.

By: shantam prem

shantam prem — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 12:49:54 +0000

Is not Mohammed more available and present all the time, even in times of war and destruction?

By: Tan

Tan — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 08:53:06 +0000

Guys, what I meant is Osho is in every corner of the world through his books, and any other work from the Resort. Good job, indeed!
I have seen it, trust me! Cheers!

By: Arpana

Arpana — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 07:46:28 +0000

Tan,
I have a picture im my imagination constantly, of Osho smiling benignly; just up to the right, so I have to look up to make eye contact.

All those millions of discourses spread all around the world in some form or other, so to those who are interested, I agree with you, Osho is everywhere, is available, all the time.

By: Lokesh

Lokesh — Sun, 25 Sep 2016 07:36:49 +0000

“Osho is everywhere”?

This could mean so many things. First of all, it would require a definition of what Osho is, what Osho represents to the person who says Osho is everywhere.

It would never occur to me to say Osho is everywhere. I appear to be here and that is enough to be going on with.

Were I to meet someone who told me that Osho was everywhere I would look around for someone more interesting to talk to.