Will keep me busy for a while, as coming up just in the midst of this and that. Reminding me of countless situations I had to go inside and check if my own life experience in my neglectable but yet available everyday´s can sufficiently relate to that.
It´s not that easy – some stuff, as it appears to be.
As mind is cunning.
Also when it senses a ´short cut´. For peace’s sake.

Thank you. For your effort ever to look into the lost and found shelves and putting it on the table.

Madhu

If Osho was who he proclaimed to be, the question of betrayal is null and void. Osho supposedly lived in a state of complete openess and honesty. One can only betray someone who has something to hide. Therefore Saadz obviously believes that Osho needed to cover something up and I have apparently threatened the cover-up by exposing it in some way unknown to me, well, at least in his clouded eyes. Whether I have or not is another question.

One thing is for sure, Osho did not present to the public anything that would smear his cherished image of being enlightened, although, over time, it has emerged that he was capable of behaving in a thoughroughly unenlightened way, especially behind the scenes.

On another level this could be viewed as Osho being completely honest because, unless I am mistaken, Osho declared that he would behave in such a way as to blow everyone’s preconceived ideas about how an enlightened man should behave clean out of the holy waters. At this Osho succeeded magnificently.

Fascinating biblical character you’ve chosen to pair me with. Judas was the most socio-political of Christ’s disciples. If it is to be believed, Judas had no choice in his role as traitor, he was a man of destiny.

Such was his angst, after his main part was played out, he threw away the copper coins he’d been paid and frantically searched for a suicide method to despatch himself from the stage of life poste-haste. He came across a solitary tree by a cliff edge and tied one end of his shawl to it. The other end he tied around his neck in order to hang himself. He then threw himself off the cliff.

Unfortunatey for Judas he’d done a shoddy job of tying a hangman’s noose in his frantic haste. The knot came undone and it was thus that he tumbled down onto a pile of boulders. The poor man died a slow, agonizing death on the blood-splattered rocks.

It is a tragic tale indeed and one I cannot relate to in any way that comes to mind on a personal level. It is therefore that I presume Saadz has some need to project the role of some kind of Judas on me because something in my writing provides a screen for him to do so. I really haven’t a clue what he is talking about.

What a pile of unadulterated, meaningless crap! Such stupidity is unworthy of further comment.

Thank you,

Madhu

That is not a simple question. It is a complicated question produced by someone who is simple-minded, as in lacking in mental acuteness or sense.

Methinks the poor chap presumes to know a lot more than he actually does.