About this, how should I call it – addictive? – talk about Shantam’s writings? I would sometimes like to take part in it, also in a critical view, but it does not seem to be possible, because the whole thing is out of proportion. And frankly has racist shadow in it. So, that needs to be balanced at first, then people discuss, or argue, and it’s not horrible.

PS: I am not going to give in to the retired Ibiza cat farmer, a pleasure to overwhelm a housewife. In your dreams, mouse.

Why do you ask? Don’t you have anything better to do with your time than to read your own posts from the past?

It seems, Fresch, that you don’t quite see the central issue of this ‘Shantam debate, which is that it’s irresponsible not to respond to someone who’s using an open forum to propagate what one regards as untruth, coming from an inadequate sense of what he’s talking about.

This may or may not be because you yourself don’t perceive what I’m afraid I have to describe as the inherently immature bias of the content of many of his comments here. My guess would be the former is the case.

Whether you are fed up with the ongoing ‘debate’ is neither here nor there, it’s irrelevant, Fresch. And calling upon Ashok to remain silent compounds your error.

When you write of SD as sometimes “insightful”, would I be right in thinking that what you really intended to say was ‘inciteful’?

On a more serious note, however, I would agree with you that the lad has some redeeming qualities…he’s not all bad, is he? You have on occasion described him as “sweet”, I however would say that that his major strength is ‘incisiveness’, which he is only too willing to demonstrate given a sniff of a chance (ie if the dog is given a bone to gnaw on).

Unfortunately, this strength can also become his downfall, particularly when he, along with other members of the pack, viciously attack some poor unsuspecting victim and refuse to let go, engaging in negative behaviour which you yourself have described as a “futile exhausted ditch”. Let us pray together compassionately for their redemption, even though “they know precisely what they do!” (Lukesh 23:24)

MOD: WE EDITED OUT THE REST OF THIS POST AS IT WAS SPECULATIVE GOSSIP!

Do you sometimes read through the history of your own postings like you recommended to me in a private e-mail, while recommending I should retract from posting at all here?

Inconceivable with what character you here show up (25.4.2014 at 11.40 pm).

And more inconceivable that you managed so far to get some followers in SN at any time to go for a slum-fight.