One of Osho’s purposes was to ‘spread the word’ as far and wide as possible, wasn’t he? What better than the enormous publicity this would have generated? (However negatively it would almost certainly have been presented by the tabloid press, for example).

Might have been interesting to see whether MJ would have been assigned any therapy, as it seems he needed tons!

But I know, from my own exoerience,that there’s something in the sannyas movement that promotes the ‘puer eternus’ (eternal child) syndrome as something almost ultimately desirable. At the expense of adult maturity, it would appear.

Very likely down to damaged personal childhoods (and very understandable too).

Hence, I reckon, this strange ‘fixation’ upon the ‘Peter Pan’ character that was MJ.

Did he? Because he was a great dancer and sang catchy little adolescentish love songs?!

Not saying he didn’t do his best, not saying he wasn’t hugely talented…

But so very damaged, so flawed!
Nothing ‘wrong’ with that of course, I’m not ‘looking down’ upon the man, but let’s get him in proper perspective, please.

Not a question of being ‘judgmental’ at all, but of seeing him for what he was beyond the hype over-kill, not buying into the media/pr version.

I trust those who almost ‘deify’ MJ respond in similar fashion to the likes of Fred Astaire, Gene Kelly, Ginger Rogers, Rudolf Nureyev, Margot Fonteyn?

If not, why not?!!

But he didn’t really ‘do it’ for me, for the reasons already given.

Are you then suggesting that it follows that my “inner child” is not functioning?

If you are, then I say to you you’re talking total, unmitigated nonsense!

The problem with MJ was surely that he simply hadn’t grown up, due to a damaged childhood, and I repeat that to compare him to Osho is just lacking in discrimination, it’s really very silly!

…Don’t just listen what media says. It is everywhere the same – not looking for truth!

Even without knowing about this Osho and Mickels story, I always felt that, on some level, for me MJ and Osho are simmilar. They both had a wery strong energy field. Osho – one of the reasons: becaurce he was expressing his awakend soul and MJ – one of the reasons was that, becouse he was so total, like nobody, in his creativity.

To like osho and MJ or not to like, is some other thing, if you take it from intellect. But, If your inner chid is still allive and plaing and dancing, then there is just no way not to like this dudes.

Love
Moksha

Add to that his evident immaturity and frankly, I hardly see what all the fuss is about!

So I find all the talk here of Jackson’s ‘spirituality’ extremely naive and simply lacking in discrimination.

Osho rated him? Perhaps as a potential vehicle for renewed huge publicity, and indeed, why not?!

Osho was/is a great Master, Michael Jackson was just another ‘struggler’ (imho), like most of the rest of us.

Michael’s death has the most biggest effect on me ever in my whole life…..
I am touched by his love, totality, geniuses, amazing creativity, pureness, innocence, beauty…..and he has become my mirror and trigger suddenly, strongly and from such a far away…..It’s overwhelming…..

I love Michael Jackson deeply…..
I am so~proud to feel his beauty…..
He and his creations will live in my heart forever…..
Love…..